it costs from $500 to $1000 to purchase a small home made solar panel seystm, you can make one yourself for a mere fraction of that. Small solar panels offer you the
(Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5)
Your apparently uynrelding justification seems to rest on the conflation of production and distribution. There is no necessary join here: production can be compensated while copying is completely free. That is the essence of abstract/nonrival goods. So you seem to have no basis to propose property-like restrictions.Here is the ideal: we pay people for the time/effort/resources to create, then we all copy and use that product freely and unrestrictedly. It is not essentially a matter of property. We want new and better systems of organisation, but the restrictions of property are what we want to *avoid* if at all possible.That abstract goods are infinitely copyable is exactly why they are especially valuable. To restrict that with no reason would seem utterly foolish, like simply throwing away a free natural resource. So unless you have a good reason, your efforts would be better applied thinking of non-property alternatives.
(Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5)